Operations

Industry groups turn to courts, customers and staff to force reopenings

Groups in New Mexico and Texas go to court to thwart governors' shutdown orders.
restaurant openings
Photograph: Shutterstock

As pressure builds to re-shut restaurant dining rooms, so is the industry’s pitched resistance to the rollbacks.

The New Mexico Restaurant Association (NRMA) said it plans to seek a court directive today to halt the shutdown of on-premise service that Gov. Michelle Grisham ordered last week.

Simultaneously, the group is organizing a grassroots campaign to goad the state executive into reversing her order and allowing limited on-site service to continue. The efforts include an email campaign and a “virtual demonstration” today. Participants are encouraged to print out a sign that shows how many people the establishment employs.  Then, the association advises on its website, have the staff and customers stand outside the place and brandish the sign while a picture is taken. The photo should then be sent to the governor.

“Restaurants are once again being punished for the uptick in COVID-19 cases despite the fact that the governor said that they are not the source of infection, and have been complying with her orders,” the NRMA says on its website.

At least two lawsuits have been filed by Texas bars to reverse Gov. Greg Abbott’s directive from two weeks ago to suspend the sale of alcohol by bars for on-site consumption. The suits argue that Abbott violated the rights of the plaintiffs, which number several dozen, by singling out bars and denying the owners their livelihoods.

In Michigan, a group called Unlock Michigan is conducting a petition drive and public relations campaign to deny Gov. Gretchen Whitmer the power to issue and enforce executive orders, including a shutdown of most bars in the state. The organization contends that Whitmer lacks the constitutional authority to maintain the actions for more than 28 days without approval of the legislature.

Seventeen bar-restaurants in Tennessee’s Shelby County have filed lawsuits against the county and its health department for allegedly violating their rights under the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The actions say the establishments were closed because at least 51% of their revenues are generated through the sale of alcohol, even though the places see themselves as restaurants, not gin mills. Bars in the jurisdiction have been ordered closed, while restaurants can offer limited dine-in service.

Lawsuits seeking statewide reversals of bans on on-premise bar service have also been filed by establishments in Florida and North Carolina.

Members help make our journalism possible. Become a Restaurant Business member today and unlock exclusive benefits, including unlimited access to all of our content. Sign up here.

Multimedia

Exclusive Content

Food

Inside Chili's quest to craft a value-priced burger that could take on McDonald's

Behind the Menu: How the casual-dining chain smashes expectations with a winning combination of familiarity and price with its new Big Smasher burger.

Financing

Here's the big problem with all these $5 meal deals

The Bottom Line: With McDonald’s planning a $5 value meal of its own, more brands are already jumping onto the bandwagon. But not everybody will pay $5.

Financing

What did the Starbucks CEO expect?

The Bottom Line: Howard Schultz needed just one bad quarter to make public his displeasure with the coffee shop chain. But the stage was set for that two years ago.

Trending

More from our partners