Workforce

10 states open investigation into restaurants’ ‘no poaching’ pacts

Pixabay

The attorney generals of 10 states have opened an investigation into so-called no-poaching agreements, the stipulations in restaurant franchise agreements that prohibit franchisees from hiring the employees of other franchisees within the chain.  

The offices of the attorneys general sent a letter yesterday to eight national quick-service chains, asking for detailed information about their use of the agreements. The recipients were asked to specify the terms of those stipulations, including what specific positions are covered and the time frame of the hands-off language. Chains that don’t require franchisees to sign a no-poaching agreement are asked to specify when they stopped.

The letter was sent to officials of Arby’s, Burger King, Dunkin’ Donuts, Five Guys, Little Caesars, Panera Bread, Popeyes and Wendy’s. 

“We are concerned about the use of no poach agreements among franchisees and the harmful impact that such agreements may have on employees in our states and our state economies generally,” wrote Cynthia Mark, chief of the Fair Labor Division of Massachusetts’ attorney general’s office, which is leading the investigation. “By limiting potential job opportunities, these agreements may restrict employees’ ability to improve their earning potential and the economic security of their families. These provisions also deprive other franchisees of the opportunity to benefit from the skills of workers covered by a no poach agreement whom they would otherwise wish to hire. When taken in the aggregate and replicated across our States, the economic consequences of these restrictions may be significant.”

The letter cites a U.S. Department of the Treasury study that found 80% of the nation’s quick-service chains include a no-poach provision in their franchise agreements. The figure is 53% across all restaurant franchisors, according to New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood.

Joining Mark in signing the letter were labor officials from the attorney general’s offices of California, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania and Rhode Island. A representative of the attorney general for the District of Columbia was also a signee. 

The reactions of the eight recipients of the letter were not available as of post time. 

Members help make our journalism possible. Become a Restaurant Business member today and unlock exclusive benefits, including unlimited access to all of our content. Sign up here.

Multimedia

Exclusive Content

Financing

Despite their complaints, customers keep flocking to Chipotle

The Bottom Line: The chain continued to be a juggernaut last quarter, with strong sales and traffic growth, despite frequent social media complaints about shrinkflation or other challenges.

Operations

Hitting resistance elsewhere, ghost kitchens and virtual concepts find a happy home in family dining

Reality Check: Old-guard chains are finding the alternative operations to be persistently effective side hustles.

Financing

The Tijuana Flats bankruptcy highlights the dangers of menu miscues

The Bottom Line: The fast-casual chain’s problems following new menu debuts in 2021 and 2022 show that adding new items isn’t always the right idea.

Trending

More from our partners