OPINIONOperations

Why ServSafe is under attack in the court of public opinion

Working Lunch: The recent New York Times story was a hit piece. There was so much more that should have been in it.

The New York Times ran an article last week that stunned the restaurant business. Tagged as a breaking news story, the piece blasted the industry’s leading political watchdog for selling a $15 food safety training program and channeling the money into the pool from which it draws its lobbying funds. Never mind that the practice has been in place for 16 years. 

The scandal, according to the story, was the National Restaurant Association’s use of proceeds from the ServSafe program to push back on proposals to raise a jurisdiction’s minimum wage. Workers’ own funds were being used to lobby against their economic interests, the piece asserted. 

The latest installment of the Working Lunch podcast takes a hard look at the story and why it’s raising eyebrows. Co-hosts Joe Kefauver and Franklin Coley, principals of the government-affairs specialist Align Public Strategies, are joined during the program by Peter Romeo, Restaurant Business’ political reporter, to parse the article and what it could mean for the industry.

Listen to how and why ServSafe and the National Restaurant Association are being cast in a negative light.

Download Working Lunch from wherever you get your podcasts.

Members help make our journalism possible. Become a Restaurant Business member today and unlock exclusive benefits, including unlimited access to all of our content. Sign up here.

Multimedia

Exclusive Content

Food

Inside Chili's quest to craft a value-priced burger that could take on McDonald's

Behind the Menu: How the casual-dining chain smashes expectations with a winning combination of familiarity and price with its new Big Smasher burger.

Financing

Here's the big problem with all these $5 meal deals

The Bottom Line: With McDonald’s planning a $5 value meal of its own, more brands are already jumping onto the bandwagon. But not everybody will pay $5.

Financing

What did the Starbucks CEO expect?

The Bottom Line: Howard Schultz needed just one bad quarter to make public his displeasure with the coffee shop chain. But the stage was set for that two years ago.

Trending

More from our partners