Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Michael Foods in Pricing Case

MINNETONKA, Minn. (January 18, 2010 - PRNewswire)—A federal appeals court directed that judgment be entered in favor of Michael Foods, Inc. in a long-running pricing case brought under the Robinson-Patman Act.

The case, Feesers, Inc. v. Michael Foods, Inc. and Sodexo, Inc., was filed in 2004. In the suit, Feesers, a regional food distributor based in Pennsylvania, claimed that it competes with Sodexo, Inc., a multinational food service management company, and that Michael Foods was required to sell its products to both companies at the same price. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Feesers' claim, holding that Feesers and Sodexo are not competing purchasers.

"We are obviously pleased with the Third Circuit's decision," said James E. Dwyer, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of Michael Foods, Inc.

In the precedential decision, the Third Circuit said Feesers and Sodexo compete only when a prospective customer is deciding between self-operation and outsourcing of its food service operations. Because sales of Michael Foods products occur after the customer has made that decision, the Third Circuit found no competition between Feesers and Sodexo in sales of Michael Foods products. With no competition, the Court said, there could be no competitive injury to Feesers.

The Third Circuit's unanimous opinion reverses an April, 2009 decision by the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania finding that Michael Foods and Sodexo violated the Robinson-Patman Act. It also reverses a subsequent District Court Order requiring Michael Foods to sell products to Feesers and Sodexo at the same price.

Michael Foods, Inc., headquartered in Minnetonka, Minnesota, produces and distributes food products for the food service, retail and food-ingredient markets. Its principal products are specialty egg products, refrigerated potato products, cheese and other dairy products.

Michael Foods was represented by Roy T. Englert, Jr. of Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck & Untereiner in Washington, D.C., and by J. Scott Ballenger, Maureen E. Mahoney, Jennifer L. Giordano and Margaret M. Zwisler of Latham & Watkins, LLP in Washington, D.C.

SOURCE Michael Foods, Inc.

Members help make our journalism possible. Become a Restaurant Business member today and unlock exclusive benefits, including unlimited access to all of our content. Sign up here.

Multimedia

Exclusive Content

Financing

For Starbucks, 2 years of change hasn't yielded promised results

The Bottom Line: The coffee shop giant’s sales struggles worsened earlier this year, despite a flurry of efforts to improve operations and employee satisfaction.

Food

Nando's Americanizes its menu a bit as U.S. expansion continues

Behind the Menu: Favorites like mac and cheese, bowls and salads join the fast casual’s Afro-Portuguese-rooted dishes, including the signature peri-peri chicken.

Financing

The consumer is cutting back, but not everywhere

The Bottom Line: Early earnings from major restaurant chains suggest the consumer has taken a distinct turn for the worse so far in 2024.

Trending

More from our partners